42 points by nosferalatu123 57 days ago | 2 comments
amelius 53 days ago
Isn't this a fancy name for just iteratively moving a vertex towards the center of mass of its connected vertices?
fc417fc802 52 days ago
At a glance it seems quite similar to Lloyd Relaxation. All these fancy names for iteratively averaging vertex coordinates. I guess the nuance is going over my head.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd's_algorithm

nkrisc 53 days ago
It’s a shorter name for that.
ramblingrain 52 days ago
It sounds like it doesn't have any guarantees regarding topology. Or maybe it's so simple or does?

Let's be positive my friends

itishappy 52 days ago
I don't think the algorithm as presented adds or removes new neighbors, preserving topology (except it won't prevent self-intersections using only neighbor positions). I imagine this is often used with some type of adaptive meshing algorithm for to make something like the clay editing model shown in the Substance demo.
nosferalatu123 52 days ago
(author here) That's correct. The algorithm preserves topology because no new vertices or indices are created. It can result in self intersecting meshes, but one way that this can be used is what Substance Modeler does, which is continuously remesh.
gsf_emergency_2 53 days ago
Truly fancy name would be something like, "Laplacian smoothing via gravitational accretion of vertetesimals"?
akomtu 52 days ago
Which is a fancy name for a low-pass filter?
ramblingrain 52 days ago
This reminds me of bouncing on a trampoline. I'm a human not a computer
peterdsharpe 52 days ago
Funny you should mention that! The surface of a trampoline can actually be modeled as a 2nd-order wave equation PDE, which uses a Laplacian spatial kernel - for the same reasons this is called Laplacian smoothing!